Movie Review: Carl Dreyer’s “The President” is Restored- Watch it Here for Free

Watching Carl Dreyer’s first feature, 1919’s “The President” is like observing humanity through a pinhole. The sets are so claustrophobic  that the characters appear to be living inside a box.  The color dyes, which are based on Dreyer’s notations but have not been applied until  this restoration, seem to drain color rather than add it.  Amber, indigo, and crimson take their turns against backgrounds so dark that life becomes  a colored silhouette.

Dreyer relates his  genetically related episodes through flashbacks that are still as revolutionary today as Godard’s jump cuts were in 1959.  For the three generations of men who pass through their genes the mistake of marrying beneath their station, life is a trap from which there is scant chance of redemption.   Warnings are passed from father to son to grandson, but fate will suffer no tampering.  Like Poe’s unlucky inheritors of the Usher curse, each man was doomed even before his birth.

While Dreyer’s later masterpieces are known for the slow deliberation of their theatricality, “The President” is pure cinematic invention, its 75 minutes moving like a jackhammer to the soul,holding us in the grip of hope and bad expectation until  the collision of tragedy and  happy endings that resolves the curse without letting its victims off the moral hook.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “Movie Review: Carl Dreyer’s “The President” is Restored- Watch it Here for Free

  1. Bill, this is most welcome. I like your analogy comparing it to Poe’s “House of Usher”. There’s a striking shot on 48.07 of the girl who mourns her mother. The way she is positioned reminds of James Whistler painting ‘Whistler’s Mother’. The frame could be named “Whistler’s Daughter”. Fascinating. Otherwise, the monochromatic gold sure gives it an ancient look. Honestly, I could have just listened to the piano playing the background. Nice review.

    Like

  2. There is a substantial influence of Whistler throughout the film on the sets and the positioning of the actors. glad you enjoyed the film. so often, these rediscoveries of early films by the masters turn out to be disappointing. This one wasn’t.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s